Search for: "CIRCUITS IN THE UNITED STATES" Results 601 - 620 of 49,745
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2024, 6:33 am
” Public and private companies need to manage to other current and pending climate disclosure requirements (and other ESG disclosures more generally) at the U.S. federal and state levels as well as outside the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 6:33 am
” Public and private companies need to manage to other current and pending climate disclosure requirements (and other ESG disclosures more generally) at the U.S. federal and state levels as well as outside the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
New York:"[The Constitution] is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar or novel and even shocking ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm by Josh Blackman
Fifth, during the travel ban litigation, there was some doubt whether United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
The state of California appealed those decisions, and the 9th Circuit paused both as it reconsiders the cases. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am by Benson Varghese
United States: Gorsuch’s Dissent Takes Center Stage On June 20, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in the case of Diaz v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am by Benson Varghese
United States: Gorsuch’s Dissent Takes Center Stage On June 20, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in the case of Diaz v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am by Benson Varghese
United States: Gorsuch’s Dissent Takes Center Stage On June 20, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in the case of Diaz v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 6:03 pm by David Badertscher
Supreme Court delivered a significant ruling in United States v. [read post]
The case was unique because the Department of Justice, representing the United States, agreed with Elringer’s position that a unanimous jury, rather than a judge, should be required to determine whether the crimes were committed on three separate occurrences. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:21 am by Robert McAvoy
  The Supreme Court of the United States recently unanimously ruled against the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am by Joseph Scapellato
He argued that the concealment of the murals resulted in both an impermissible modification and destruction of his works, but the United States District Court for the District of Vermont disagreed.[15] Denying the injunction, the district court held that under VARA, the modification or destruction of a work of visual art requires a physical alteration to the work itself.[16] After the district court’s preliminary ruling, it granted VLS’s motion for summary judgment,… [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am by Joseph Scapellato
He argued that the concealment of the murals resulted in both an impermissible modification and destruction of his works, but the United States District Court for the District of Vermont disagreed.[15] Denying the injunction, the district court held that under VARA, the modification or destruction of a work of visual art requires a physical alteration to the work itself.[16] After the district court’s preliminary ruling, it granted VLS’s motion for summary judgment,… [read post]