Search for: "Does 1 - 35"
Results 601 - 620
of 9,755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2010, 1:33 pm
Accordingly, Herengracht's allegations of sophistication and experience are insufficient to demonstrate the requisite "intent to deceive" standard under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:48 pm
Three options for responding to the Notice of Omitted Items will continue to be provided, namely (1) to petition (under 37 C.F.R. [read post]
Economic Stimulus Package Provides COBRA Subsidy for Employees, Administrative Burdens for Employers
26 Feb 2009, 2:47 pm
For employees: If I am eligible, what does this mean? [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:01 am
According to defendant, he showed good cause because Juror No. 35's account suggested that Juror No. 35 could produce evidence of juror misconduct. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
Agapito, 620 F.2d 324, 333-35 (2d Cir.) [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 4:56 pm
In NSW Bar Association does not understand the meaning of "rape" posted at The Curvature, we get a discussion of the backlash against a proposed law change that clarifies the meaning of consent so that someone who is unconscious cannot be assumed to be consenting. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:04 pm
” In its petition for en banc review, Helsinn asks the following question: Does mere public disclosure of the “existence” of a sale trigger the on-sale bar under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:34 am
” Though the packaging does state that efficacy in women 35 and older hasn’t been clearly established, Endometrin doesn’t have a Black Box warning. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 12:14 am
This question probably took 35-45 minutes to write. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 7:27 am
The regulations call for additional wage increases starting January 1, 2023, and annually thereafter. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 12:20 pm
Cir. 2018) In its 2016 en banc opinion in this case, the Federal Circuit limited the scope of the on sale bar of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 9:38 am
The grease may be compared to a physical characteristic, such as a fingerprint or one's voice, which is 'constantly exposed to the public.', 410 U.S. 1, 14, 93 S.Ct. 764, 35 L.Ed. 2d 67 (1973). [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:21 am
While we thus construe § 3(n)(1) asapplying the new AIA provisions only to new applications,it does not follow that § 3(n)(1) requires application of pre-AIA judicial review provisions to old applications.(...)For interferences declared after September 15, 2012, thisprovision explicitly authorizes pre-AIA § 141 review, butunlike AIA § 6(f)(c)(3), does not authorize pre-AIA § 146review. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:07 am
”); see also 1-2 Donald S. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Review of Corporate Finance Studies 5, 1–35. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 12:14 pm
On appeal, Amgen argues that the 271(e)(1) safeharbor does not apply to process patent liability in Section 337 Tariff Act actions. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
Determining Reasonableness As provided in the FAR, “[a] cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:06 pm
MPEP § 2144 discusses supporting a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 by reliance on scientific theory and legal precedent. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
First, we’ve got two “wild cards” to deal with as noted above: (1) Stevens has retired; and (2) what does Scalia’s refusal to join Parts II B-2 and C-2 of Kennedy’s opinion for the Court signify. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:01 am
The critical flaw with this argument, however, is that the [patent-in-suit] does not claim 'space.' Instead, it claims methods of calculating a region of space and comparing various calculations to choose a pixel color. [read post]
