Search for: "Frye"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,245
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
Frye, 176 Wash 291 (1934). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:16 pm
In Ex parte NAGAZUMI, the appellant lost: We affirm the stated rejection for substantially the reasons set forth by the Examiner in the Answer.Ex parte Frye, 94 USPQ2d 1072, 1075 (BPAI 2010) (precedential).An appellant may attempt to overcome an examiner’s obviousness rejection on appeal to the Board by submitting arguments and/or evidence to show that the examiner made an error in either (1) an underlying finding of fact upon which the final conclusion of obviousness was based, or… [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:09 am
The California Supreme Court adopted the Frye test in 1976. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:07 am
JACKSON HOLE PARAGLIDING, LLC, a Wyoming LLC, TOM BARTLETT, SCOTT HARRIS, MATT COMBS, JON HUNT, ANDREW FRYE, and JEFF COULTERDocket Number: S-11-0232URL: http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Opinions.aspxAppeal from the District Court of Teton County, Honorable Timothy C. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
FRYE John H. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:54 pm
The failure to appeal is a waiver under Ex parte Frye, 2010 WL 889747 *4 (BPAI 2010) (precedential) (―If an appellant fails to present arguments on a particular issue—or, more broadly, on a particular rejection—the Board will not, as a general matter, unilaterally review those uncontested aspects of the rejection‖).The Board noted:Principles of LawA prior art reference is said to teach away from an Applicant‘s invention ―when a person of ordinary skill,… [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
Frye, the prosecutor offered a deal for a limited time but the defense counsel failed to communicate the deal on time to the client. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:41 pm
Frye, --- U.S. ---, 132 S. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 12:13 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 5:48 am
Dustin Frye has posted “Law, and Land Tenure: Understanding the Impact of the Long-Term Leasing Act of 1955 on Indian Land Holdings” on SSRN. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:35 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 12:48 pm
Wells was actually tried, apparently without any challenge under Frye, or Rules 702 or 703, to the admissibility of expert witness testimony. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 8:59 am
On the basis of Judge Shoob’s opinion, there appears to have been no Frye motion, no motions to exclude expert witnesses based upon the Federal Rules of Evidence, and no motions to strike testimony after the fact for lack of a proper basis. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 7:45 am
No Frye motions were made. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 4:20 pm
As the ruling is in favor of the defendants in the case and the summary judgment is granted there is no need to grant the request of a Frye/Parker hearing for this particular case. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm
There are no Frye challenges discussed. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:20 am
” A spokesman for DeWine said the attorney general’s office was reviewing Frye’s ruling. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:33 pm
Frye: Two U. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am
Ceresia, after a Frye hearing (see Frye v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 12:49 pm
The Facts of the Case: On a Tuesday morning, at 4:37 A.M, a police officer was called to the area outside an establishment by the report of a fight. [read post]
