Search for: "Glass v. State" Results 601 - 620 of 1,812
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2017, 7:52 am by Dennis Crouch
The short (10-page) unanimous opinion authored by Justice Thomas reaffirms the court’s prior decision in Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 5:20 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Determining an appropriate disciplinary penalty "under the circumstances"King v New York State Off. of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 03098, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentFigueroa v New York State Off. of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 03104, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentAs the Court of Appeals explained in Pell v Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 of Towns of… [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 6:56 am by Joy Waltemath
At the time of its decision, the trial court did not have the benefit of a 2016 Eighth Circuit case, Hernandez v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 10:14 am by David Kimball-Stanley
” First, Judge Randolph notes that Press-Enterprise II was a criminal case that arose from California state court. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 7:51 am by Larry
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:48 am by Ronald Mann
The Supreme Court took the latter view in a 1957 decision (Fourco Glass v Transmirra Products), but the Federal Circuit has long thought that decision was irrelevant under the modern statutory venue framework. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
”See alsohttp://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/tc-heartland-llc-v-kraft-foods-group-57453/Mr. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:03 am by MBettman
On April 6, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:13 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
And when lists go on—as a Maine dairy company recently learned the hard way in O’Connor v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm by Ronald Mann
Section 1400 states that a “civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant resides”; the last time the Supreme Court examined the statute (its 1957 decision in Fourco Glass v Transmirra Products), it concluded that this meant “the state of incorporation only. [read post]