Search for: "Hayes, in Re" Results 601 - 620 of 692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
Hayes defeated Samuel Tilden by one electoral vote (but lost the popular vote) in the 1876 election, aggrieved Democrats agreed not to contest the outcome if Hayes would withdraw all remaining federal forces from former Confederate states, ending Reconstruction. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
Organisations should re-evaluate their data export strategy to take this into account. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm by Bexis
  But we’re not doing doctrine today, we’re doing pleading, so simply accept that legal framework for now.There are a lot of plaintiffs out there who don’t do their homework. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal After Online Warnings, Armed Civilians Bring Threat of Violence to Protests in Kenosha and Elsewhere Washington Post – Joshua Partlow, Isaac Stanley-Becker, and Mark Guarino | Published: 8/26/2020 Civilians carrying assault rifles and handguns were visible on the streets in Kenosha throughout the chaotic events that left two people dead and another wounded. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 1:46 am
In the past, Congress drafted (and President Harrison signed into law) the Electoral Count Act of 1887, which purported (in the wake of the Tilden-Hayes electoral debacle of 1876-77) to specify how future joint sessions of Congress would resolve disputed and duplicate votes from a given State. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 7:42 pm
In the past, Congress drafted (and President Harrison signed into law) the Electoral Count Act of 1887, which purported (in the wake of the Tilden-Hayes electoral debacle of 1876-77) to specify how future joint sessions of Congress would resolve disputed and duplicate votes from a given State. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:14 am by Rob Robinson
Waits for FCPA Guidance, UK Bribery Act Gets an Update – http://bit.ly/PntvcW (Catherine Dunn) Browser Tools Can Help Block Tracking by Social Networks - http://nyti.ms/Qp2hP6 (Somini Sengupta) Canadian CRTC Issues Compliance and Enforcement Information Bulletins - http://bit.ly/Ql2TW0 (Mark Hayes) Could Your Law Firm Seize Your LinkedIn Account? [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
” Under Descamps, the district court should be barred from looking beyond the elements of a simple assault statute to find that the conviction factually constituted a domestic violence misdemeanor (although the relationship can be established at trial beyond a reasonable doubt as described in Hayes). [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
bit.ly/xamNyE (Colin O’Keefe, Boris Segalis) “If You’re Gonna Just Read One Blog . . . [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Consulting Inc.Caroline Vary, Jonathan Rose CompaniesNate Daly, Berkshire Property AdvisorsMichael Haggerty, Eight Points Asset Management LLCDavid Turley, David Cronheim Mortgage Corp.James Nelson, Massey Knakal RealtyErin Beitz, Berkshire Property AdvisorsStephen Farber, First American TitleDoug Giles, First American TitleLloyd Zuckerberg, Samson Investment PartnersChristopher Cotter, Cotter & Kavanaugh LLPThomas Jakab, Israel Berger & AssociatesMichael Duckfield, Israel Berger &… [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm by Kali Borkoski
§ 2254(d), that a defendant retains a constitutional right to revoke his prior waiver of counsel at trial and require re-appointment of counsel to file a new-trial motion. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
“What we’re trying to seek is clarification that the limits can be enforced,” Lessig said. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
” Eastwood’s observation provoked applause by the convention delegates, so he continued: “I think attorneys are so busy—you know they’re always taught to argue everything, and always weigh everything, weigh both sides. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am by Schachtman
The recent issue of Environmental Health Perspectives contains several interesting articles on scientific methodology of interest to lawyers who litigate claimed health effects.[1] The issue also contains a commentary that argues for greater transparency in science and science policy, which should be a good thing, but yet the commentary has the potential to obscure and confuse. [read post]