Search for: "Johnson v. People" Results 601 - 620 of 2,719
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For example, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Jeffrey Morris
President Lyndon Johnson nominated Weinstein in January 1967, and he was confirmed three months later. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 12:53 am by Tessa Shepperson
And as we have all heard Boris Johnson repeatedly say, the democratic will of the people must be respected and it is not for politicians to frustrate it. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:50 am by Eric Goldman
Google Twitter Isn’t a Shopping Mall for First Amendment Purposes (Duh)–Johnson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Johnson suggested that nuclear war might result if Barry Goldwater was elected president. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 9:04 am by David Post
"** ** The court's holding here regarding the level of scrutiny to be applied in this case appears to be in conflict with two other decisions (Johnson v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
Editor's Note: This post contains the text of a speech that former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson delivered on Feb. 6 at the American Constitution Society (ACS) Symposium at the Georgetown University Law Center. *** I am happy to be part of this symposium. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:52 pm by Stephen Griffin
  Some people think the House could have won more help from the courts, but this was pure speculation. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm by Donald Thompson
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th  Dept 2006]). [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am by Kalvis Golde
At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter looks to past precedent in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:45 am by Jonathan Shaub
Ron Johnson, for example, said that he wanted to protect against the “weakening of executive privilege,” and Sen. [read post]