Search for: "Kind v. Superior Court"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm
As I have detailed on this blog (most recently here), due to two Delaware court decisions — the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm
As I have detailed on this blog (most recently here), due to two Delaware court decisions — the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
Marquez v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:14 pm
Kind, LLC., 1:15-cv-03699-WHP (S.D.N.Y.), Short et al v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:14 pm
Kind, LLC., 1:15-cv-03699-WHP (S.D.N.Y.), Short et al v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 11:55 am
Plaintiff then sued defendants for fraud in Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 11:59 am
For the opinion:https://www.eff.org/document/aclu-v-la-superior-court-ca-supreme-court-opinion For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/automated-license-plate-readers-aclu-eff-v-lapd-lasd Tags: Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)Contact: JenniferLynchSenior Staff Attorneyjlynch@eff.org DavidColkerACLU SoCal Press & Communications StrategistDColker@ACLUSOLCA.org [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:49 am
Rev. 1149**As to state law and patents-->To support this position, the court looked to Jim Arnold Corp. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 5:30 am
In Myers v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 5:00 am
The case, Ag Spectrum v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:16 am
That is why, for example, even the historically exemption-resistant California Supreme Court in Harris v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 1:21 pm
McLaughlin went to superior court and tried to make a collateral-estoppel pitch. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 11:56 am
PC 99-5226, Rhode Island Superior Court, Providence (Feb. 26, 2007) (discussing Rosner and Markowitz’s testimony on post-verdict motions); Altria Group, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 9:12 am
(Williams v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
That was the issue the Sixth Circuit faced in Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 7:21 am
" Excerpt:I’m really examining the social science at the core of [Brown] and saying that the social science argument that the court made was wrong—or at least was painfully and tragically incomplete....The court, for its own peculiar reasons, wanted to claim that black people, as a result of segregation, had suffered a kind of grievous and catastrophic psychological injury. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I provide a brief summary of the United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 2:35 pm
Resoundingly.After a very lengthy and careful discussion of “standard of review”, the Court concluded that the Board is entitled to deference when dealing with s. 19 of the Copyright Act – which deals with equitable remuneration and not the kind of infringement issues that come before the superior courts. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 2:35 pm
Resoundingly.After a very lengthy and careful discussion of “standard of review”, the Court concluded that the Board is entitled to deference when dealing with s. 19 of the Copyright Act – which deals with equitable remuneration and not the kind of infringement issues that come before the superior courts. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:44 pm
Hartman, 2017 ONSC 3922 COURT FILE NO.: C-584-15 DATE: 2017/06/27 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: ) ) Steven Minke, Linda Minke, Cameron Minke and Brittany Minke Plaintiffs – and – Stephen Hartman, Foot Works and Foot Works Inc. [read post]
