Search for: "Novelty, Inc." Results 601 - 620 of 765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 8:54 am by Dennis Crouch
Note: In the same Post-Bilski order, the Supreme Court also issued a GVR in the case of Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
The Court has read the §101 term "manufacture" in accordance with dictionary definitions, see Chakrabarty, supra, at 308 (citing American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:46 am by Victoria Pynchon
Automobiles The horse is here to stay but the automobile is only a novelty—a fad. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:20 pm by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
On March 29, 2010, the University of Utah and Myriad Genetics Inc. lost a U.S. court ruling over some of its patents for detecting inherited breast cancer related to the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. [read post]
25 May 2010, 1:28 pm by Ray Dowd
Novelty, Inc., 329 F.3d 586, 592-93 (7th Cir.2003); Imperial Residential Design, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:21 am by @ErikJHeels
(New Bedford, MA) Bean Town Novelties, Inc. [read post]
21 May 2010, 2:54 am by John Day
Factors to be considered as guides in determining the reasonableness of a fee include the following: (1) The time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly. (2) The likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer. (3) The fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services. (4) The amount involved… [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:18 pm
Teleflex, Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 406-07 (2007). [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:42 am
See, Goldstein v AccuScan, 2 NY3d 811 (2004); see also, Novelty Crystal Corp. v PSA Institutional Partners, LP, 49 AD3d 113 (2d Dept. 2008). [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:56 am by Schachtman
In Betz, the Superior Court’s resolution of the issue seems to lie in modifying the proponent’s burden of proving the lack of novelty into a burden on the opinion’s opponent to prove novelty. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of USWEAR for boys clothing over US WEAR for adult’s clothing: In re USCANTEEN, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability on this specimen of use question: In re Seelect, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps North Face – ‘South Butt’ parody lawsuit comes to a quiet end (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney)   Wales Welsh dragon copied Hong Kong dragon? [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:19 pm by Ray Dowd
  A divided Ninth Circut confirmed a finding of copyrightability over a spirited dissent in  Lanard Toys Ltd v Novelty Inc, 2010 WL 1452527 (April 13, 2010).At issue was Chinese knockoffs of popular American toys. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:15 am
: Line One Laboratories Inc v California Exotic Novelties LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) ITC: Initial determination finding violation of s 337 (trade mark and copyright infringement) in energy drink investigation based on complaint by Red Bull (ITC 337 Law Blog)     [read post]