Search for: "POWELL v. STATE"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,604
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2017, 9:29 am
A judge or jury must then decide what the real reason for the firing was.The Supreme Court laid out the framework for adjudicating such cases in its 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:17 pm
To be sure, Nixon v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:12 am
Jogee corrected the historic mistake in Chan Wing-Siu [1984] UKPC 27 and R v Powell/English [1997] UKHL 57 of equating foresight with intent to assist in cases of alleged secondary participation. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:29 am
Judge Michael Powell dissented. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
Powell, 452 So. 2d 132 (Fla. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 5:16 pm
’ United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
’Powell v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:59 am
Powell, Jr. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:03 am
On April 6, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:50 am
Estate of Johnson v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 7:53 am
See, Powell v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:03 am
However, the Supreme Court in December 1970 decided on a challenge to the law, in Oregon v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm
United States, 519U.S. 172, 183 n.7 (1997); United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
Colin Powell served as Reagan’s final National Security Advisor before he became Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under President George H.W. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:24 pm
”[2] Earlier, in Powell v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 5:33 pm
Professor Powell took a leave from academia from 2009 to 2012 to serve in Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Policy Planning Office and in the White House National Security Council as Director for Human Rights in the Obama Administration. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:58 am
A recent unpublished case, State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:58 am
A recent unpublished case, State v. [read post]