Search for: "SJ" Results 601 - 620 of 1,385
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2015, 6:07 am by SHG
But when one has permission to use a soapbox as big and loud as the New York Times Supreme Court Correspondent, as opposed to say my puny soapbox at SJ, you don’t get to use it to flog some petty bias over a dubious study with a “distinction” so trivial as to mean nothing, all of which leads to the chance to call a Supreme Court Justice lazy and dishonest. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
E. coli O157:H7 was identified for the first time at the CDC in 1975, but it was not until seven years later, in 1982, that E. coli O157:H7 was conclusively determined to be a cause of enteric disease. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
 We had posts about the case by Kirsten Sjøvoll and Amber Melville-Brown. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 7:39 am by Haskell Murray
As mentioned in my post about law schools hiring in business law areas, we received the following posting from The University of Utah S.J. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 6:40 am by SHG
A surprising number of readers told me that they wish I had a paypal “donate” button so they could contribute to the ongoing existence of SJ. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:50 am by SHG
Somebody at Casetext signed me up, I guess, to give me a SJ channel? [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
– Kirsten Sjøvoll Finally, we repeat our invitation to anyone who is interested in a guest post (or repost) on any of the topics which we cover. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 5:50 am by SHG
  Not to diminish those of you who read SJ, but my fellow blawgers are gone. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
The grant of a privacy injunction in the case of AMC v News Group Newspapers ([2015] EWHC 2361 (QB)) has unleashed a deluge of largely inaccurate media comment worthy of the “super injunction spring” of 2011. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:55 am by SHG
  * If you’re not on the Jackson List, you are not allowed to read any further because you fail to demonstrate the level of intellectual curiosity and strength to be worthy of SJ. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
 Follow us @inforrm Our Top Twenty Posts of all time have been as follows (in descending order of popularity): Harassment and injunctions: Cheryl Cole – Natalie Peck  “The cases of Vanessa Perroncel and John Terry – a curious legal affair” – Dominic Crossley Case Law, Strasbourg: Von Hannover v Germany (No.2) – Unclear clarification and unappreciated margins – Kirsten Sjøvoll Social Media: How many people use Twitter and what… [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Frank was deeply offended by Clark’s “enlightened” view of procedure and SJ. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:20 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
.): 164 Jamestown and Port Gamble Motion 167 Lummi Motion 168 Lower Elwha Motion 176 Jamestown and Port Gamble Response 178 Suquamish Response 183 Lower Elwha Response 186 Jamestown and Port Gamble Reply 189 Lummi Reply 193 Lower Elwha Reply 210-Order on SJ This matter is on remand from the Ninth Circuit, materials here. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 6:35 am by SHG
I tell them they would be happier at reddit, because I want them out of SJ. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm by Schachtman
Bosman, “An unusually complicated case of primary Sjögren’s syndrome: development of transient ‘lupus-type’ autoantibodies following silicone implant rejection,” 31 J. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 7:50 am by SHG
But while I won’t make a pittance in royalties, at least it won’t cost me much to fulfill my money-back guarantee that reading SJ will be worth your time. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:24 am by SHG
As any regular SJ reader knows, there is nothing in there that hasn’t been discussed here, sometimes long ago, at far greater depth. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 5:59 am by SHG
  But the option here will be SJ with all its warts or no SJ at all. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Result: ED Va decision--VACATED AND REMANDEDlink: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/14-1477.Opinion.6-5-2015.1.PDFSome textThe districtcourt adopted Samsung’s reasoning, narrowing its constructionof “display format” to exclude signals in formatsthat required further deconstruction or reassembly at theexternal monitor in order to be displayed by the monitor.VIS SJ II, 2014 WL 1685932 at *10.This was error. [read post]