Search for: "State v. Cross #2"
Results 601 - 620
of 7,672
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:28 am
A California appeals court held (in Badie v. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 12:07 pm
Tucked away in the annals of unpublished New Jersey appellate decisions is State v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:38 am
But he's probably always going to be broken (or cross-wired, or whatever). [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:52 pm
” See La Crosse Tech., Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:47 am
Arrellano's cross-examination? [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 7:16 am
The jury had two sets of claims before it: (1) implied contract arising from the County's EEO policy, which prohibited discrimination and (2) federal and state antidiscrimination statutory violations, including Title VII. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 9:06 am
In Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:22 pm
These include, as potentially relevant here, "(2) Accrual when damage results. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:54 am
Affirming a state district court, the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled that an African-American state employee failed to present sufficient evidence that health plans offered in certain ZIP codes were inferior and that those inferiorities resulted in an adverse impact (Cartwright v State of Nebraska, August 9, 2013, McCormack, M). [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 5:41 am
Per CBC Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:55 am
As we have previously written, in 2004, the United States Supreme Court, in Crawford v. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 5:30 am
Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kan. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:42 pm
"Cross" always came moreeasily than "undertakings" 2. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 12:13 pm
Separation of church and state — rightly understood — is vital. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 5:07 am
The government’s long-awaited proposal for addressing cross-border data requests, in the form of draft legislation, is finally here. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:20 am
They don’t need a Confederate-battle-flag-waving party before them to recognize that some speech is offensive, and that states may want to distance themselves from such speech. 2. [read post]
