Search for: "T. R. T."
Results 601 - 620
of 304,508
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2011, 3:16 am
r? [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 8:15 am
L’Office de la propriété intellectuelle du Canada (OPIC) a finalement déposé la très attendue ébauche du projet de Règlement sur les marques de commerce (Règlement) le 19 juin dernier. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 8:15 am
L’Office de la propriété intellectuelle du Canada (OPIC) a finalement déposé la très attendue ébauche du projet de Règlement sur les marques de commerce (Règlement) le 19 juin dernier. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:00 am
Fоrtunаtеlу, оur јudісіаl brаnсh hаs а рrеsumрtіоn оf іnnосеnсе untіl рrоvеn guіltу, аnd thіs mеаns thаt аnуоnе сhаrgеd wіth а сrіmе,… [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 4:11 am
That appeal was never remitted to the Board, so could not possibly lead to any refund under R. 103(2). [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
In this examination appeal, the Board held - deviating from T 1265/10 - that regardless of whether or not the EPO would have access to sufficient the funds of the party intending to pay, such an intention can never be considered equivalent to an order.Referring to R 18/13, the Board further found that - different from a mistake made by an assistant - the mistake made by the representative to not explicitly instruct his assistant to pay the appeal fee and to not properly review… [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
In this examination appeal, the Board held - deviating from T 1265/10 - that regardless of whether or not the EPO would have access to sufficient the funds of the party intending to pay, such an intention can never be considered equivalent to an order.Referring to R 18/13, the Board further found that - different from a mistake made by an assistant - the mistake made by the representative to not explicitly instruct his assistant to pay the appeal fee and to not properly review… [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 5:26 am
David R. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
A “Noting of loss of rights pursuant to R 112(1)” was issued by the Board on February 18, 2010. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
Therefore, there is no basis for the reimbursement of the appeal fee under R 103(1)(a). [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:52 am
SFGate.com: RI court: Texts can't be used in child murder case by Michelle R. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
Only after the OD had decided that Patent proprietor’s main request before it contravened the requirements of R 57a, did the patent proprietor protest against the admittance of the late filed documents. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 7:53 am
(Rép. min. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:14 am
However, examining divisions should make sure that an internet disclosure used as state of the art is reliable in terms of both the publication date (see decision T 1066/13, Reasons 4 to 4.3; see also the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO, G-IV, 7.5.1) and continued accessibility to its content in the version made publicly accessible on that date (see decision T 3071/19, Reasons 5; see also T 0013/20, Reasons 4).9. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
In case of doubt the board had, so the argument, no choice according to T 1505/06 [3.1] but to remit the case. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:05 am
So suggests a new study, Prestigious Colleges Won't Make You Happy in Life or Work. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 8:14 am
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GenderAndTheLawBlog/~4/LbdjLEpRO5Y" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:28 am
The Family Law Prof Blog posted Even in Academia, Dads Don't Do Diapers. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:33 pm
Why can’t people imagine a future without falling into the sexist past? [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:27 pm
R-E-S-P-E-C-T Find out what it means to me R-E-S-P-E-C-T Take care ... [read post]
