Search for: "United States v. Classic"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Gilead does not include the entirety of what used to be the United States, but that aspect of the story is not pertinent to this discussion. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:28 am
United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:51 pm
The classic form of “extraterritoriality,” after all, is effects-based regulation — the application of U.S. law to conduct that occurs in another country on the basis of the harm that results within the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am
Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and Council, implemented in the United Kingdom by the Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002, requires member states to take steps to ensure the free movement of information society services between member states. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:58 am
The following contribution to our Kiobel v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 1:59 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In U.S. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
After evaluating her claim, the district court ruled in favor of Match.com, citing Title 47, Section 230 of the United States Code, known as the Communications Decency Act (CDA). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:31 pm
Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:35 pm
Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 12:32 am
Tompkins principles in Rimbert v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 5:01 am
A recent United States Tax Court case, Urgent Care Nurses Registry, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 6:31 pm
For the United States, the traditional form of popular solidarity and independence—grounded in fear, crisis and its resolution—and originating in and through popular action (even if elite directed). [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:59 pm
Kitty Block is CEO of the Humane Society of the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 2:46 pm
United States, 445 U.S. 222, 227-30, 100 S.Ct. 1108, 63 L.Ed.2d 348 (1980), first recognized the “classical” theory of insider trading. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am
The “it” in Giuliani’s explanation could also refer to pausing certain immigration temporarily, in order to assess whether the United States’ current criteria for screening immigrants actually work. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm
Mossoff's article is written in the wake of Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:31 am
United States, 171 F.2d 921, 936 (1st Cir.1948); United States v. al Liby, 23 F. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 9:02 pm
The appellate judges came down on Idaho’s side when a section which criminalizes obtaining records of an agricultural production facility by misrepresentation—protected against a legally cognizable harm associated with a false statement survived constitutional scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:42 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has already issued one ruling in Apple's favor against Google's Motorola (reversing and remanding an ITC ruling, which Google just asked it to reconsider), was clearly leaning Apple's way last month with respect to its continued pursuit of a permanent injunction against Samsung, and based on how today's appellate hearing on Judge Richard Posner's June 2012 dismissal of a two-way Apple v. [read post]
