Search for: "W Smith" Results 601 - 620 of 3,103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]
29 May 2020, 5:40 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Friday, May 22, 2020 Tags: Disclosure, Environmental disclosure, ESG, SEC, Securities regulation, Stakeholders, Transparency Whataday for Special Committees: Committee Formation Requirements in Non-MFW Scenarios Posted by Barbara Borden and Caitlin Gibson, Cooley LLP, on Saturday, May 23, 2020 Tags: Boards of Directors, Books and records, Conflicts of interest, Controlling… [read post]
27 May 2020, 1:11 pm by Jon Sands
Baker, No. 14-99003 (5-21-20)(Christen w/Murguia; N. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Smith's interpretation of free exercise than with the dissent's understanding of it…. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:11 am
Posted by Stephen Klemash, Jennifer Lee, and Jamie Smith, EY Center for Board Matters, on Sunday, May 24, 2020 Editor's Note: Steve W. [read post]
16 May 2020, 8:45 am by Apostolos Anthimos
Enneking Erasmus School of Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands Monika Feigerlová Institute of State and Law, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic Leonhard Hübner Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privat- und Wirtschaftsrecht, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany Luca Kaller Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Hamburg, Germany Milana Karayanidi Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe… [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Sineneng-Smith, arguing that “[u]nless and until Justice Thomas abandons the modern First Amendment entirely, one should regard with extreme skepticism his call for the re-examination of specific doctrines–like overbreadth and the rule of NY Times v. [read post]
• “[W]e recognize that the base lodestar figure amounts for most of the relevant Arthur Andersen(30) considerations. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
At Keen News Service, Lisa Keen writes that “[w]hile LGBT people nervously await the U.S. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:24 pm by Gabriel Chin
As Judge Stephen Williams once memorably wrote, “[w]hile a judge isn’t a pig hunting for truffles in the parties’ papers, neither is he a potted plant. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
Instead of adjudicating the case presented by the parties, the appeals court named three amici and invited them to brief and argue issues framed by the panel, including a question Sineneng-Smith herself never raised earlier: "[W]hether the statute of conviction is overbroad . . . under the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am by Emily Coward
Smith, The Historical and Constitutional Contexts of Jury Reform, 25 Hofstra L. [read post]