Search for: "Doe, Appeal of"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 108,007
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2009, 7:00 am
Too bad the court system does not permit a "dual track" scenario where the parties settle the case, but also, just out of curiosity, the court decides a pending motion, the outcome of a pending appeal, or a jury deliberates notwithstanding the settlement. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:40 pm
City and County of Honolulu, No. 28602, which seeks review of the Intermediate Court of Appeals' decision reported at 120 Haw. 457, 209 P.3d 1271 (Haw. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 2:00 pm
A-09-323 (Jan. 26, 2010), the Nebraska Court of Appeals held that a post-Kelo "no takings for economic development" statute did not prohibit the city from taking property for a decleration lane on a public road simply because the lane leads to a "well-known national retailer of consumer goods. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:29 am
Accordingly, the Court of Appeals reversed. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:05 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
The mere fact that some exemptions were granted does not render the laws not generally applicable. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:52 am
Thai prosecutors appealed the decision on Washington’s request. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:37 am
Stein appealed to the Eighth U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:41 pm
SOURCE: DALLAS COURT OF APPEALS - 05-10-01119-CV – 4/19/12 [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 7:05 am
The second ground of appeal The Judge does not accept this argument either. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 7:39 am
., the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or “Board”) recently clarified the standard for what triggers the 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 7:39 am
., the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or “Board”) recently clarified the standard for what triggers the 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 7:39 am
., the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or “Board”) recently clarified the standard for what triggers the 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
Lawyers for Detroit indicated that the city does not oppose an expedited process, to the extent that it will not delay efforts to confirm a plan of adjustment in the case. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:00 am
” The employees appealed. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
” In contrast, the court found that Educator’s appeal of her U-rating was timely.Considering the merits of Educator’s appeal of her U-rating, the Appellate Division noted that Educator had invoked DOE's administrative procedures to appeal the U-rating and the Chancellor's Committee held a hearing and sustain Educator's appeal and recommended that the U-rating be reversed. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:54 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral argument yesterday (mp3 podcast here) in In re Shinnecock Smoke Shop, Serial Nos. 78918061 and 78918500 (September 10, 2008) [not precedential]. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:06 pm
The ruling said judges should “deny the warrant altogether” if the government does not consent to such a plan in data-search cases. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 12:47 pm
(GAT) appeals the final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, rulingthat institution of inter partes review was not barred under35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 12:01 am
Just because HRCP Rule 72 does not mention cross-appeals does not mean they are not allowed. [read post]
