Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 6221 - 6240 of 13,896
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2015, 5:06 am
Talisman Energy, Inc., 244 F.Supp.2d 289, 336 (S.D.N .Y.2003) (holding Sudan inadequate forum based in part on “greatly reduced rights” of plaintiffs under Shari’a law and “total lack of legal personality” and “diminished testimonial competence” for non-Muslim witnesses); UNC Lear Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  The application will now be renewed in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
On Monday, June 1, 2015, the United States Supreme Court reversed a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit which had granted Abercrombie & Fitch (“Abercrombie”) summary judgment in a religious accommodation case brought by a job applicant who wore a headscarf (a hijab) to an interview, but did not mention her religion or request an exception to Abercrombie’s dress code. [read post]
On Monday, June 1, 2015, the United States Supreme Court reversed a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit which had granted Abercrombie & Fitch (“Abercrombie”) summary judgment in a religious accommodation case brought by a job applicant who wore a headscarf (a hijab) to an interview, but did not mention her religion or request an exception to Abercrombie’s dress code. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
Braun, 14-1123, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 2:00 am by mtwomey
  On May 19, 2015 the Board of Standards and Appeals voted to grant the applicant, BBD & D Inc, a permit to construct a penthouse at 237 East 72nd Street in the Upper East Side of Manhattan. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Tracy Coenen
Free speech is a privilege we enjoy in the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(VIS) appeals from stipulated final judgments of noninfringementand invalidity entered in favor of SamsungElectronics, Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:30 am by Terry Hart
MercExchange—which, though it involved an injunction for patent infringement, is just as applicable to copyright injunctions— 8The Ninth Circuit is among the Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal to explicitly hold so, see Perfect 10 Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"**Subsequently CSEA filed a grievance contending that the County had violated the CBA by requiring unit members to serve a probationary period in excess of the 26 weeks on unit members. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"**Subsequently CSEA filed a grievance contending that the County had violated the CBA by requiring unit members to serve a probationary period in excess of the 26 weeks on unit members. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:45 am by Ron Coleman
 This seemed to have been confirmed by the decision, not long afterwards, in Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]