Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 15,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2016, 4:30 am
The current state of artificial intelligence is the primary technological barrier to implementing the proposed AITP system. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:50 pm
The court cited Moore v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm
Jonathan Heawood, the director of press regulator IMPRESS, has written an article in the Press Gazette saying that the regulator is “no more a state regulator than a company which passes its audit is a state company. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 1:37 pm
Fazlul Sarkar, once of Wayne State University, a case which IPBiz has not been covering. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Fox News v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
” 1863: The New Zealand Settlements Act, which authorized the government to confiscate land from certain tribes without compensation, was passed. 1877: In Wi Parata v The Bishop of Wellington, the chief justice of the Supreme Court declared the Treaty to be “worthless” and a “simple nullity. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:47 am
Both parties relied on in-depth expert evidence from scholars specialising in Islamic studies/law. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am
However, the burden would be too much if the skilled addressee was required to undertake “new inventions or additions or prolonged study of matters presenting initial difficulty“. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
Study. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
Study. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:54 am
” Ginsburg’s dialogue also included a line about “throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet,” a callback to her dissent in Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:18 am
Wassom published the first in-depth study of the legal implications of augmented reality (Augmented Reality Law, Privacy, and Ethics). [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 8:14 am
See Cassista v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:57 am
United States ex rel Rigsby, which involves the effect on a lawsuit under the False Claims Act of a violation of the act’s seal requirement, and Lynch v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 9:07 am
Just as it is helpful to study historical propaganda, Richards’ article should be studied to understand how the lawsuit industry will try to induce error in judicial ju [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:59 am
Techs v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am
In last year, Sofa Works v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:05 am
Let's study the "60 Minutes" transcript. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
At the first tentative sign of a disfavored move—say, for instance, a retreat from Roe v. [read post]
