Search for: "Wall v State" Results 6241 - 6260 of 7,693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:34 pm
Yes, Michael Cannon and I called the provision a “glitch” in the Wall Street Journal, and it is a “glitch” insofar as the relevant provisions of the PPACA may not produce the result that many PPACA supporters had desired. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
Two witnesses—a former State Department official and Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS—declined to be interviewed, but there is no suggestion in the report, or in the inspector general’s testimony, that this altered the outcome of the investigation. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
He noted that the Fourth Amendment requires, but the OFCCP has not adopted, the Fourth Amendment procedural protections of: subpoenas for contractor objections to off-site investigations, as required by the High Court’s 1946 decision in Oklahoma Press Pub Co v Walling (10 LC ¶51,222), and warrants for contractor objections to on-site investigations, as required by Supreme Court’s 1978 ruling in Marshall v Barlow’s Inc (436 U.S. 307). [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:40 am
Attempts to Regulate Payday Lenders Currently, garnishment of social security benefits is illegal and all active-duty military families are protected by the Military Lending Act signed into law on October 2006 - capping interest rates at 36% on all small loans, including payday loans, for all military families.[43] Small loans are governed by state law, and many states have implemented restrictions on payday lenders.[44] For example, many state have placed restrictions… [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 6:26 am by Dean Freeman
Numerous other state high courts (including Florida’s in the 2000 ruling in Nova Southeastern University v. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 10:31 pm by Leland E. Beck
Agency Jurisdiction Deference:  The Supreme Court scheduled oral argument in City of Arlington v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm by Ilya Somin
He wrote well-known dissents in several previous cases striking down congressional laws on federalism grounds, including United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:58 am by Steve Dickinson
Chinese companies saw the writing on the wall and abandoned investment in the U.S. in 2018. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:30 pm by Paul Ohm
If the California state courts share my concerns about overbreadth, they should consider embracing the very sensible rules for search warrants for computer hard drives (in any case, not just those involving journalists) adopted last year by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]