Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 6261 - 6280 of 11,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am by christopher
#startups nyc london…http://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2291836513200414722012-07-28 11:42:20 HarvardLaw74: Krista Cox 8 case citation amicus brief in Wiley First Sale case #copyright…quite good [Can a book publisher sell a book at 50 percent off overseas and prevent its import back the United States for a second sale? [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm by WIMS
[#Air, #CA5]   GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS (click here)32 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental ProfessionalsWaste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:05 am by David
Experts think that this will probably end up in the Supreme Court of the United States after the 9th Circuit threw out a case. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:33 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
The judge is overseeing evidence-gathering efforts in cases against Bard, J&J, Boston Scientific Corp. and the American Medical Systems unit of Endo Pharmaceutical Holdings Inc. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am by Carolyn E. Wright
”  Henry Holt & Co., to Use of Felderman v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am by Carolyn E. Wright
”  Henry Holt & Co., to Use of Felderman v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Kent Services Ltd.19 The rule was effectively applied 100 years ago by the House of Lords in TW Thomas & Co. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:29 am by Richard Bortnick
Rick In a landmark decision, the First Circuit Court of Appeals held in Patco Construction Company, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:45 am by Bexis
  We think cy pres could be the Lexecon (that is the Lexecon, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:41 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
While we’re on the subject of “a federal statute is presumed to supplement rather than displace state law,” perhaps Garner and Scalia would like to take a moment to explain PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]