Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 6261 - 6280
of 41,390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2014, 9:02 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:30 pm
Statements in open court are a powerful means of vindication as they will invariably attract some press interest. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 11:15 am
See Rhode Island v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:33 am
Bica (1976), the Court unequivocally stated that the “[p]ower to regulate immigration is unquestionably exclusively a federal power. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:57 pm
The state relies primarily on a 1976 case, De Canas v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:12 am
Adler) This morning the Supreme Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:44 pm
§ 48 in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 12:20 pm
The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Monday issued an order stating that the court will rehear Feds for Medical Freedom v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:15 pm
See: http://municipalminute.ancelglink.com/2017/07/court-upholds-ordinance-prohibiting.html In Youngberg v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:22 pm
In that case, Sullivan v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am
As the current Court term churns along and conferences and arguments are conducted and orders are issued, one case from last term--Madison County v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:07 am
By Aaron Olsen The United States Supreme Court declined to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm
One reviewer of the episode wrote: Perry cites a real case, State v. [read post]
Volunteer ambulance organization is not a “state actor” for the purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment
16 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Volunteer ambulance organization held not a “state actor” for the purposes of the Fourteenth AmendmentGrogan v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:12 am
In the 1982 landmark case of Plyler v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:46 am
Oct. 11, 2022) BONUS: Millennium Funding, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:56 am
Supreme Court decided Sveen v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:21 am
City of Riverside v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
And it is this power of the federal government to exclude as well as direct states and non-Indians when it comes to relations with tribes that has a long and well-established pedigree: it was the understanding embodied in the Constitution in the wake of the Articles, advocated for by Native peoples (as Greg Ablavsky and I have traced), and affirmed in the foundational Indian law case of Worcester v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:49 am
And while State v. [read post]
