Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 6301 - 6320
of 22,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2020, 11:43 am
As always, the IELR covered extradition matters. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:43 am
As always, the IELR covered extradition matters. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:11 am
In August 2019, the NPCSC adopted the Law on Resource Tax, which subjects natural resources including crude oil, natural gas, coal, and other minerals to the resource tax. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 10:52 am
As a result, the City adopted Policy 7-13, titled a “Policy for the Sale of Surplus Property with Provisions Relating to Affordable Housing. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 9:18 am
The Senate's Rules, assuming they use the Rules adopted for the Clinton trial, will permit, though they will not require, calling witnesses to testify. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 6:52 am
[T]his court denied plaintiffs' post-trial motion pursuant to Rule 1:38-11 to seal the trial court record …. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 6:00 am
If adopted by the Senate and implemented in good faith by Chief Justice Roberts, the rules will provide the basis for a fair trial that all should regard as conclusive on the matter, regardless of whether the Senate convicts or acquits. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 10:31 pm
The CJEU has not yet ruled on this reference. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:55 pm
DOL adopts the four-factor test from its proposal. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Second, recognizing that fairness also dictates that such notifications be made to the attorneys for all parties, not simply the attorneys for the children, the measure requires that, except in cases involving children freed for adoption, both notices of changes in placement and indicated child maltreatment reports be conveyed to attorneys for the birth parents. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 12:42 am
This law, adopted in 2011, recognizes victims of the armed conflict and confirms their rights to truth, justice and reparations. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:50 pm
While the Court’s opinion made clear that some privilege might apply here depending on the facts of this defamation case, it ruled in this matter of first impression that district attorneys general are not entitled to the absolute executive official privilege. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
If we could go behind the philosopher John Rawls’s “veil of ignorance,” without knowledge of the political affiliation of the president or the House leaders, what neutral principles would we adopt about impeachment, executive privilege and obstruction? [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
They argue that Trump has asserted constitutional privileges and that the House should have asked the courts to expedite rulings on those claimed privileges and immunities. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 9:32 am
It does not matter that the employer may find the employee’s absence to be unreasonable in terms of duration, frequency or timing. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
Some commentators have floated that idea that it would be permissible and advisable for the Senate sitting in the matter of President Trump’s impeachment to adopt a rule of private (that is, unreported to the public) voting on the question of whether the President ought to be convicted of the articles of impeachment adopted by the House. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
This exception applies “where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted” Court applied same bifurcated standard of review as has been developed for the unusual circumstances exception – whether the project is located in a particularly sensitive environment is a substantial evidence question; but the question of impact based on such a location is a fair argument question… [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:04 am
Congress is set to push back on President Trump’s recent use of force against Iran. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:58 am
But barring some other violation of Facebook’s rules, it would still circulate no matter how deceptive, significant, or harmful. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The trial court denied relief and at the court of appeal, Petitioner argued that Public Resources Code §21080 provided as a matter of law that a zoning ordinance was a project. [read post]
