Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 6321 - 6340 of 9,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2013, 10:51 am by Charles Kotuby
U.S. courts can “command[] [a party properly before it] to take action … outside the United States” under the pain of sanctions for non-compliance, the Chief Justice said. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:54 am by Gene Quinn
Dissecting Bilski: The Meaning of the Supreme Patent DecisionWho knows what goes through the minds of anyone, let alone a cloistered Justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 11:00 pm by Dennis Crouch
And it now is grown by more than 90 percent of the 275,000 soybean farms in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 2:10 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
  There are several other cases across the United States involving allegations of a purported surrogate hastening a patient's death for selfish financial reasons, for example: the Van Note case in Kansas City and the Norval case in Southern California. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm by Orin Kerr
Also, King involves privacy in new technologies The nine-to-zero vote in the recent GPS decision, United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am by Marissa Miller
United States, in which the Justices will consider whether the Federal Tort Claims Act allows a prison inmate to sue the government for an alleged sexual assault committed by guards at a federal prison. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:02 am by Kit Case
The parties made a Joint Statment on November 13, 2012 announcing the Court’s approval: he United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Judge Robert N. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 7:23 am by Schachtman
  Some may find irony in the CPR’s past criticism of Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Hawaii: The so-called ‘Steven Tyler Act’, named after the lead singer of Aerosmith, will be considered in the state Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am by Cormac Early
United States, a challenge to the ban on direct corporate campaign spending in the Federal Campaign Finance Act, and McCutcheon v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 7:38 am by Robert Cook-Deegan
  It is clear that the patent rights in this case have affected who can get tested, how testing is conducted in the United States, and who owns and controls the information that results from genetic tests. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 6:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Second, the case itself (apart from the issues on appeal) demonstrates the increasing specter of criminal liability in cases of trade secrets theft - particularly when the theft is intended to benefit companies outside the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:18 am by Marissa Miller
Perry, the challenge to California Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]