Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 6341 - 6360 of 14,312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2014, 3:55 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
The Supreme Court again considered Lord Browne-Wilkinson’s judgment in the case of Target Holdings (above). [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:55 pm by Jane Chong
Oral argument took place last Tuesday before Judge Janice Rogers Brown and Senior Judges Stephen Williams and David Sentelle (audio here). [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The judge explained that the accused had spent two distinct periods of time in … Brown v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 7:02 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Recent ruling by the Appellate Division concerning alleged unlawful discriminationBrowne v Board of Educ, 2014 NY Slip Op 07465, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentMatter of Katz (Commissioner of Labor), 2014 NY Slip Op 07556, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Browne decision:This decision by the Appellate Division illustrates the shifting of a party’s “burden of going forward” in litigating a complaint alleging unlawful discrimination.Robert… [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm by Lorene Park
A federal court in North Carolina refused to dismiss their class action under the FCRA, which alleged that Lowe’s routinely used consumer reports, but failed to provide copies or notice of the reports before taking an adverse employment action (Brown v Lowe’s Companies, Inc). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:27 am by Venkat Balasubramani
"] Other aspects of the dispute that had intersting and recurring social media tweaks: other public employee cases have raised the similar issue of whether the employee was speaking as a citizen or an employee; the law is employer-favorable, but I would not be surprised to see an appeals court give her another chance (this aspect of the dispute vaguely reminds me of Bland v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 11:06 am by Benjamin Bissell
Orin Kerr linked to the audio in Klayman v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]