Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 6341 - 6360 of 20,986
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2017, 3:03 am by William Montgomery
[v][vi] This statistic alone highlights the most significant driver of the massive industry growth: people enjoy watching other people play video games, and are willing to pay to have a quality experience. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 4:50 am by Matthias Weller
” Against this background, the Study deals, inter alia, with (i) shortcomings of Article 7 no. 4 Brussels Ibis Regulation; (ii) possible improvements of choice of law in relation to cultural property such as the question of a “lex originis” as a potential variation to the lex rei sitae under certain circumstances; (iii) potential amendments on the level of substantive law such as e.g. the accession of the remaining Member States to the UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or… [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am by Wolfgang Demino
Scope of WaiverProperty Code section 51.003 — entitled "Deficiency Judgment" — provides that, if a deficiency remains after a nonjudicial foreclosure sale, any action to recover the deficiency must be brought within two years of the foreclosure sale. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am by Wolfgang Demino
Scope of WaiverProperty Code section 51.003 — entitled "Deficiency Judgment" — provides that, if a deficiency remains after a nonjudicial foreclosure sale, any action to recover the deficiency must be brought within two years of the foreclosure sale. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am by Joy Waltemath
While the plaintiff would have preferred a summary judgment ruling on the merits and permanent injunctive relief, it conceded to the stay, so long as the preliminary injunction was in place (Thrivent Financial for Lutherans v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 6:50 am by Michael Geist
Differing approaches is also a theme in a submission from KPMG, who note the following areas of inconsistency: scope (just few digital services v. all services; B2C v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
Bruno agreed that the constructive trust claim failed to state a valid cause of action, for two reasons. [read post]