Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 6361 - 6380 of 8,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2012, 10:19 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Dec. 20, 2006) (construing “adapted to,” in light of patent as a whole, to mean “con- figured to,” not “capable of”).ANDsee generally Comark Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/zpfcer (Elkan Abramowitz, Barry Bohrer) Reports and Resources Classified National Security Information Program for State, Local, Tribal and Private Sector (PDF) 1.usa.gov/yzxOby (Homeland Security) comScore Releases February 2012 U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:11 am by Simon Lester
“Australia is prepared to defend any challenge that might result from the consultations. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:24 am by Law Lady
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.Criminal law -- Speedy trial -- Where state had charged defendant with fleeing to elude, it was error to allow state to file amended information charging defendant with new offense of fleeing to elude with high speed or wanton disregard of persons or property after speedy trial period had ended -- Record does not support contention that defendant waived speedy trial by accepting a trial date outside speedy trial period --… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:10 am by stevehansen
  These differences are: 1) continuation application practice, and 2) the written description requirement. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:07 am by Lawrence Higgins
American Conference Institute's FDA Boot Camp conference is scheduled for March 20-21 in New York, NY. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 12:21 pm by ebcarpenter
In March 2011, he entered an “Alford plea” — a plea deal in which the defendant is adjudicated guilty but does not actually admit guilt. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:59 pm by Kevin F. Brady
 Goldman clung to its previously obtained contract to make it the exclusive advisor on the spin-off and which promised Goldman $20 million in fees if the spin-off was completed. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:35 am by K&L Gates
  In so finding, the court noted that 26(e) does not provide a “safe harbor” for a “lack of diligence. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:26 pm by slkimbro
The fact that the company had to spend so much money defending its permissible advertising methods raises concerns. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:49 am by Kevin LaCroix
Only 19 of the public company participants had market caps under $1 billion. [read post]