Search for: "Charles v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 4,374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2007, 7:10 pm
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSUnited States Court of AppealsFOR THE FIFTH CIRCUITFifth CircuitF I L E DOctober 26, 2007No. 07-70042 Charles R. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 6:05 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Charles University in Prague Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2014/I/1. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:36 am by Kevin
From a recent Courthouse News report of new filings in Louisiana (thanks, Andy):  USDC Eastern District of Louisiana New Orleans Charles Edward Lincoln III and all others similarly situated v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Buckley and how civil rights lawyers attacked the state action requirement in Shelley v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Matt Sundquist
Humanitarian Law Project and United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Charles Johnson
Houston Criminal Lawyer Charles Johnson provides a strong defense to conspiracy charges at both the state and federal level. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 2:36 pm by Giles Peaker
Lumsden v Charles (2025) EWCC 7 A county court appeal in a tenancy deposit penalty claim, which is both a catalogue of ‘you don’t want to do it like that’, and has a significant point on the operation of section 48 Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 8:28 am by Charles Rothfeld
Charles Rothfeld is special counsel at Mayer Brown. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
As Chief Justice Marshall explained in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 6:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
   Oklahoma completed the execution of Charles Frederick Warner less than an hour after the Supreme Court had acted.) [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 2:03 am
Here is a copy of the declaration of Charles Wolfram, a very well-known expert on attorney ethics. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am by Dave
Charles Terence Estates Ltd v Cornwall Council [2011] EWHC 2542 (QB) (subnom oh dear, oh dear)Forgive the length of this note, but this seems to be a significant case with potentially far-reaching ramifications. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am by Dave
Charles Terence Estates Ltd v Cornwall Council [2011] EWHC 2542 (QB) (subnom oh dear, oh dear)Forgive the length of this note, but this seems to be a significant case with potentially far-reaching ramifications. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 8:25 am by Charles Sartain
Posted by Charles SartainCo-author Andrew Neal Non-operators have had a lot in common with Br’er Rabbit ever since 2006, when the Texas Supreme Court surprised the industry in Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. [read post]