Search for: "Dean v. United States"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris), state or federal court (see his dissent in Michigan v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:44 am
Kagan as Solicitor General for the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 6:01 am
Johnson said minority enrollment has fallen despite the United States Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Grutter v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 3:08 pm
In a new amicus brief filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:55 am
Dean Paul Mahoney, the current dean at Virginia, recently posted a reply to my testimony. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:26 am
Ringhand is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and J. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
The Submitting Professors are affiliated with forty-seven universities around the United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:42 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
A few weeks back, in Meriwether v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals, and the chief judges of the highest state courts, deans of almost all law schools, and a limited number of law professors and distinguished private practitioners. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 9:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 12:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 1:23 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
The Constitution specifies that when the President of the United States is tried, “the Chief Justice shall preside. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
United States and Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:38 am
Before Guantánamo and its repercussions, the United States boasted the most vibrant system of civil domestic human rights enforcement in the world. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
United States, the most famous Court opinion involving an impeachment case. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm
Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm
In Flores v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
