Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 621 - 640 of 107,880
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2018, 11:24 am by Marcia Shein
The majority opinion was written by Justice Breyer and held that a guilty plea does not prohibit a defendant from raising an appeal. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:01 am by Michael Rosenblat
If the review entity does not issue a decision in 60 calendar days an action may be brought in Federal District Court within 60 calendar days. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 12:13 pm by Bowen "Bo" Ranney
We believe the most important change is that the revised appeals process does not permit a supervised entity to appeal “adverse [supervisory] findings . [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 4:30 am by Brady Hermann
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit recently held that a failure to file a probate claim does not extinguish a mortgage lien under Rhode Island law. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:06 am by Gregg M. Barbakoff
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently held that the tolling doctrine set forth in American Pipe & Constr. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by Hector E. Lora
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently held, in a case of first impression in that circuit, that a secured creditor’s failure to turn over collateral repossessed prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition does not violate the automatic stay. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 9:53 am by New York Criminal Defense
Early last week the Court of Appeals reversed a decision of the First Department which held that the rule of law announced in People v Catu applies retroactively to pre-Catu convictions (People v Smith, 132 AD3d 511 [1st Dept 2015]) -- a decision I had labeled a "huge success for the criminal defense bar" in an October blog post.In People v Catu, the New York Court of Appeals held that the court must advise a defendant of the post-release supervision (PRS)… [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Blog  Editorial
  Notably, the case of Tamiz v Google Inc. was refused permission to appeal on the grounds that the application does not raise an arguable point of law. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 10:41 am by Steven Koprince
”  Therefore, “the fact that [AMEL] requested that the CO reconsider the NAICS code does not alter [AMEL’s] deadline for bringing a NAICS code appeal at OHA. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 7:26 am by David Adelstein
A recent appellate decision out of Florida’s Sixth District Court of Appeal holds that a trial court’s denial of motion to dissolve a lis pendens does NOT automatically give a basis for a petition for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Department of Justice will file an amicus brief contending that Title VII does not include protection against discrimination based on sexual orientation while it has been also reported that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission will file an amicusbrief arguing that Title VII does prohibit discrimination based on the sexual orientation of the individual. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:09 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals holds that the filing of an EEOC charge does not toll the statute of limitations for related state torts claims. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:03 pm by Scott McKeown
What does all of this mean for PTAB practitioners? [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 9:24 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Similarly, the remand here for a Van Cleave hearing is part and parcel of Elnicki's direct criminal appeal and, therefore, the civil appeal statute does not apply. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 7:12 am
An recent case from the Indiana Court of Appeals points out two other grounds. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 12:50 pm by Employment Services
While many jurisdictions recognize the dual intent doctrine, which allows a workers’ compensation claim when a worker is injured while traveling for both business and personal purposes, Ohio does not. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 8:50 am
That information is based on nationwide figures, and does not necessarily reflect the situation with the Third Circuit. [read post]