Search for: "Eli, Inc."
Results 621 - 640
of 1,001
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
By David Evans Nov. 9 (Bloomberg) -- Prosecutor Michael Loucks remembers clearly when lawyers for Pfizer Inc., the world's largest drug company, looked across the table and promised it wouldn't break the law again. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
International Code Council, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 2009 WL 2208570 (D.N.M.) [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:29 pm
" Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 2:28 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 489 F. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:23 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:13 pm
Barr Labs., Inc. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:42 am
Subsequently, the CJEU held in Case C-493/12 Eli Lilly & Co Ltd v Human Genome Sciences Inc [EU: C:2013:835] that Article 3(a) must be interpreted as meaning that it was not necessary for the active ingredient to be identified in the claim by means of a structural formula. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:27 am
This was summarised by HHJ Hacon as a "basic principle of patent law in the United Kingdom" and cited Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical Inc v H. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:30 am
| Tune in LIVE for tomorrow's Eli Lilly v Actavis Supreme Court showdown | French court rules that resale right royalty must be only paid by sellersNever Too Late 142 [week ending on Sunday 2 April] | Conference report: Online platforms and intermediaries in copyright law | Fun with Fujifilm Declarations! [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
Judge Robinson had concluded that the patent was valid, and applied the test articulated in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:58 pm
”[13] Three months later Vice Chancellor Laster returned to the fray in Wagner v BRP Group, Inc.,[14] in which a similar contract was at issue.[15] In Wagner, the Vice Chancellor described Moelis as having adopted a two pronged test. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1, at para. 42. [3] See Sections 27(3)(b) and 28.3 of the Patent Act, RSC 1985, c P-4 [4] Burton Parsons Chemicals, Inc v Hewlett-Packard (Canada) Ltd, [1976] 1 SCR 555 at 563 [5] Apotex Inc v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc, 2008 SCC 61 at paragraph 37, [2008] 3 SCR 265; see also Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v Eurocopter, société par actions simplifiée, 2013 FCA 219 at paragraph 65; Mylan Pharmaceuticals ULC v… [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Mylan Inc., ___ F. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
Philip Morris, Inc., ___ P.3d ___, 2009 WL 1563373 (Nev. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:17 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
13 May 2010, 4:58 pm
Sandoz, Inc. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 3:26 pm
Robert Klein Elie Dolgin/Nature photo Klein's comments carried unusual weight, given that they were supported by his unique and influential relationship with the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine(CIRM). [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:09 pm
Cir. 1997) (hereinafter, Eli Lilly). [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:12 pm
Weisburd, partner, Dickstein Shapiro • Gene Quinn, president & founder, IPWatchdog, Inc For more information about the agenda, please see the brochure here: http://www.managingip.com/pdfs/USPatentForum.pdf. [read post]
