Search for: "In Re Kent"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 am
(Kent has detailed so many examples of this from California I can't even begin to recount them).We know how to reduce crime. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 12:02 am
So how could we bring about the re-use of unused property and land for housing? [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 3:29 pm
The sheer amount of the delay, the court explained, essentially puts the defendant in a twisting, Kafkaesque world, leaving him nothing but years of cruel speculation about when or even whether the state's grim reaper will appear at his cell door.This analysis is incorrect for the reasons Kent explains. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 1:13 pm
I am also passionate about traveling and have been fortunate enough to participate in exchanges at Sciences Po Aix-en-Provence (in France) and the University of Kent (in England). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:53 pm
Kent v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
At PrawfsBlawg (cross-posted at Re’s Judicata), Richard Re compiles a list of law review articles cited in recent Supreme Court opinions. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am
Commentary on the Court’s decision comes from: Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, who contends that “[t]he whole sordid tale can tell us something important about how the court does its business today when interpreting statutes”; Garrett Epps of The Atlantic, who applauds the decision on the ground that “[p]rosecutorial overreach happens every day” and contends that “it is to the Court’s credit that six of its justices contented themselves with… [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:16 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger asks why the Court’s decision in Plumhoff v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:19 am
Commentary on the decision comes from Noah Feldman, who argues at Bloomberg View that, “[o]n closer examination . . . the decision is less satisfying than it appears”; from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, who observes that there “is already a movement afoot to remove IQ ceilings from the definition of intellectual disability altogether” and argues that the movement “must not succeed” in the context of eligibility for the death penalty… [read post]
26 May 2014, 4:00 am
Helfand, Between Law and Religion: Procedural Challenges to Religious Arbitration Awards, (Chicago-Kent Law Review, Forthcoming).Edward C. [read post]
25 May 2014, 3:38 am
“It’s kind of sad that we’re going to put the cart before the horse, really,” he said. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:18 am
“ At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the Court’s statement in its recent decision in Navarette v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:17 pm
One person in Kent County, five people in Michigan and people in several other states have gotten sick. [read post]
14 May 2014, 10:25 am
If you or a family member became ill with an E. coli infection or HUS after consuming food and you’re interested in pursuing a legal claim, contact the Marler Clark E. coli attorneys for a free case evaluation. [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:45 pm
I like to think that I do too, having been a decently successful lawyer in the USAO for a few years.As Kent points out, Prof. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:39 am
Image credits: Video from Joel and Ethan Coen's Fargo (1996); other images except photo of Russell Kent Gordon from Wikimedia Commons. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:39 am
A three-judge panel of the Court affirmed summary judgment for Nationwide, but the plaintiff, with the help of the American Civil Liberties Union, has asked to have the case re-heard by the full court. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:56 am
If you're lucky have a conscience, you work to get better. [read post]
