Search for: "Matter of Gore v Gore" Results 621 - 640 of 692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Moreover, even such a limited right to bear some arms is also limited by the place in which arms can be borne, with “laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings” (in Scalia’s words) fitting easily within the confines of the Constitution.Again, “keep and bear arms” is textually indistinguishable from “shall have power to grant,” in the sense that both offer unmodified terms—“arms and… [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court articulated the modern extraterritoriality test in two alcohol price-affirmation cases in the 1980s.[14] Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am by David Super
  (By contrast, the Gore supporters misled into voting for Pat Buchanan in 2000 by “butterfly ballots” look much more like the victims of fraud.) [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Our concern is that critics of the RNC case, and (for that matter) the Justices themselves, have put the remedial cart before the substantive-law horse. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am by Ronald Collins
Wells: The standard answer to this question is that three years of blood and gore made him cynical and detached. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Indeed, a William & Mary Law Reviewessay I wrote in 1999 and published in early 2000 (well before the Bush versus Gore election and litigation made ISL notions more salient) was, as far as I can tell, the first law review piece to use the phrase “independent legislature” or “independent state legislature” in this setting.The reason I surmise that Supreme Court action in the North Carolina matter is coming shortly is that the request for full review, or… [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:39 am
The Supreme Court Thursday is expected to issue arguably the most anticipated decision since 2000's Bush v. [read post]