Search for: "Matter of T S B"
Results 621 - 640
of 19,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2023, 1:06 pm
Rule 30(d)(3)(B) allows courts to limit the scope and manner of the deposition. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Todd, the SEC appealed the district court’s granting of Gateway Inc. officials John Todd and Robert Manza’s motions for judgment as a matter of law, which set aside the jury verdict against them on Section 10(b), Rule10b(5), and Rule 13b2-2 claims; they also appealed the district court’s granting of motions for summary judgment regarding alleged securities violations by Jeffrey Weitzen, Gateway’s CEO and president. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
Yet, it isn’t. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 11:03 am
Florida Dep't of Transportation, No. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:16 pm
Michels, New Jersey Attorney Ethics, § 15:2-2(b) at 306 (2010). [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 8:09 am
I have advocated that pooling should be a matter of contractual agreement among the parties. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
Ultimately, though, Salvo’s pie still ended up with an impressive “B. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:38 am
QUESTION: Our board voted on a matter that was not on the agenda. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:44 pm
It doesn’t matter whether you want kids to think you’re cool or you just don’t see any problem with giving alcohol to minors. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:11 am
Although seemingly disposed not to treat Form 395-B data as confidential, the FCC wasn’t clear on whether CIPSEA might apply to those data, so it put that question out for comment in 2004. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
If a person is a professional representative, then his/her employment status simply should not matter. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Novelty[3] Since it was not contested by the [patent proprietor] that the washing machine with model number WD-R100C constituting the established public prior use, as exemplified in Appendix B, comprises all features of claim 1 of the patent in suit and since the Board finds no reason to conclude otherwise, the subject-matter of claim 1 lacks novelty (A 54(1)) and the [patent proprietor’s] main request is therefore not allowable. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:45 am
The manager generally used foul language, which isn’t good, but it isn’t illegal either. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
If that’s true, does the residual goodwill story still matter? [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
These five groups of contrasts are a priori linked by (a) a molecular weight of < 14,000 Daltons and (b) by the common effect of having affinity for an abnormally expressed biological target associated with oesophageal cancer or Barrett’s oesophagus. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 7:36 am
I've frequently quoted this line, as it's seemed both (a) clearly right and (b) related to the difficulties that source-based taxation presents in practice. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 11:01 am
Hence, the Board concurs with the OD that the advantages of the invention vaguely alleged in the patent-in-suit cannot be taken into consideration in the identification of the technical problem solved. [1.3.2] Since the patent-in-suit has been found to contain no disclosure of a plausible technical advantage produced by the addition of the perfume mix into the viscous product (i.e. by the feature characterizing the claimed subject-matter vis-à-vis the prior art), the Board finds not… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
High levels of CTL’s specific for the used epitope were elicited in the animals. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:01 pm
The discussion of this matter by the Board is quite interesting:[3.1] The essence of the [opponent’s] attack on sufficiency of disclosure was that the LTC temperature range covered by claim 1 of the main request was not well-defined, since any information with regard to the heating rate to be applied during the heating step for the determination of the LTC temperature was missing. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 11:38 am
Kyle's assessment. [read post]
