Search for: "People v. Stevens" Results 621 - 640 of 2,542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Page 585 Steven Greenfield, Great Neck, for petitioner. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:30 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
The Supreme Court also has weakened the ability of people to band together to challenge malfeasance of large corporations, see Wal-Mart v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Aitken v DPP ([2015] EWHC 1079 (Admin)) the Divisional Court dismissed a former editor’s appeal against a conviction for publishing a story which breached an anonymity order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 12:45 pm by Jeralyn
We've seen the hard way in the Citizens United case and campaign finance and in Bush v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
Related, CPSC finally holds public hearing on magnet sets standard [WLF Legal Pulse] SCOTUS sleeper Bond v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Justice Stevens' lead opinion, to its credit, starts with the precedent most at risk in Crawford: the Court's 1966 opinion in Harper v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Dean v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 8:39 am
For example the Court of Appeals in People v Rawlins and People v Meekins (10 N.Y.3d 136 [2/19/2008]), considered how Crawford applies two categories of evidence: DNA reports and , fingerprints, comparisons. [read post]
1 May 2019, 11:30 pm
One cause is perhaps a little circular: because designs are less well known less people file them than TMs and patents and therefore they receive less attention. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 3:26 pm
Open source v proprietary software". [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:15 pm by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
Snyder appealed that decision, which brought the case, Snyder v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: Federally, few rulings have wreaked such havoc on the political process as the 2010 case Citizens United v. [read post]