Search for: "People v. Wear" Results 621 - 640 of 2,634
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2010, 8:36 am
  So while the vast majority of people who qualify under the "in-state tuition for three years in a California high school" are already residents, and hence for whom the law doesn't matter, there are some people for whom it matters a lot. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
So, employees can miss work if they feel unsafe about anything relating to COVID-19 (e.g., not everyone is vaccinated, or some people refuse to wear masks). [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 3:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Such a claim was successful in People v Mitchell (2010 NY Slip Op 06926 [4th Dept 10/01/10]) in which the Court held thatThe evidence at trial established only that defendant constructively possessed the firearms with respect to the criminal possession of a weapon counts of which he was convicted, and thus the People proved only a single actus reus (see People v Laureano, 87 NY2d 640, 643; People v Hunt, 52 AD3d 1312, lv denied 11 NY3d… [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:03 am by Eugene Volokh
But when Cohen was convicted for wearing a jacket bearing an epithet, we did not apply O’Brien. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:45 pm by Mays & Kerr LLC
“Sex stereotyping based on a person’s gender nonconforming behavior is impermissible discrimination,” the appeals court ruled in 2004 in Smith v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:22 am
Good thing that there are Courts of Appeal (like the 4th Appellate Court) who found in People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:09 pm by Lysander Johnson
Some people argue that there’s no reason to wear a PDF in cold seas because a person would die within two or three minutes from hypothermia. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:09 pm by Lysander Johnson
Some people argue that there’s no reason to wear a PDF in cold seas because a person would die within two or three minutes from hypothermia. [read post]
12 May 2017, 10:56 am by Ron Coleman
 Very few people are prepared to build businesses around disgusting trademarks. [read post]