Search for: "Price v. State Bar" Results 621 - 640 of 2,556
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2008, 8:24 am
Vacation Village (CVSG 1/7/2008) (whether federal law bars states from recognizing a property owner’s rights to compensation for use of navigable airspace up to 500 feet above the property) No. 07-512, Pacific Bell v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Except, on Friday, Judge Cathy Bissoon from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania concluded EEOC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
On the 1709 Blog, Ben records a US$ 25,000 hit in the pocket as the price for abusing the DMCA take-down procedure -- though most of it goes to the lawyers. [read post]
24 May 2022, 8:31 am by Zak Gowen
In the United States, the Supreme Court largely resolved these issues at the federal level in its landmark decisions of Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 8:31 am by Zak Gowen
In the United States, the Supreme Court largely resolved these issues at the federal level in its landmark decisions of Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Nevils, in which the justices held that a federal law governing employee benefits pre-empts state laws barring subrogation and reimbursement. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm by Eric Goldman
According to the FTC: While 1-800 Contacts prices below traditional ECPs, its price is on average higher than that of other online merchants, often by a substantial amount. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:19 am by D. Brad Hughes, Esq.
  The Fifth Circuit reasoned the law did not bar the United States from governing the conduct of its own citizens in foreign countries when the rights of other nations are not infringed. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:29 am by Joe Koncelik
Back in June, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case of Sackett v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:48 pm by Jarod Bona
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]