Search for: "The People v. Mills"
Results 621 - 640
of 872
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
In a 1922 article for Popular Radio magazine, Mills repeated these sentiments: Radio has developed in such an amazing and spectacular manner that it promises to become the greatest factor the world has ever known for the dissemination of information and education of the whole people. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:12 am
In the 1970s, in People v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
., corporate) patent mills over the small, scrappy inventor who must now keep all ideas secret (and not shown to VCs) until the application is filed. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 5:33 am
This point was considered in the case of Howlett v Holding ([2006] EWHC 41 (QB)). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:55 am
Neil v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:34 am
See Turek v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
Mills v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:48 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] DigiProtect USA v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
– Princeton University enforcing open access (1709 Copyright Blog) US Copyright – Decisions 6th Circuit Court of Appeal: Not just ownership, authorship: Severe Records v Rich (Property, intangible) US Trademarks Recognizing “secondary meaning in the making” would protect new trade dress (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) NYT discusses trademark bullying, though its example case is questionable (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Bizarre BMW commercial seems similar to… [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:35 am
In Bennett, et al. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:28 pm
Where yesterday it was Wal-Mart v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
: 09-076/09-090/09-091 Superior Fine Papers Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:31 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:51 am
(June 14, 1991) (presented by plaintiffs’ counsel Jim Pettit, of Greitzer & Locks), in Radcliff v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 12:13 am
……..Possibly but only in the robust form espoused by John Stuart Mill, Octavia Hill etc, not Clegg’s bunch of pathetic 6th form prefects, with their ‘Lets not upset anyone’ policies. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:15 am
Although the Human Rights Law is silent as to the manner and effective date of commencing an appeal from a determination by the Commissioner of Human Rights (or a DHR regional director), the Appellate Division noted the "considerable body of precedential law" in support of its ruling, citing People v Dimmie, 15 NY2d 578. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:48 am
" Mills v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 11:53 pm
The Government Precinct comprises land in the Buitenkant, Mill, Hope and Roeland street areas. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 5:08 am
Servs. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
General Protecht Group, Inc. v. [read post]
