Search for: "UP-039 - State v. Day" Results 621 - 640 of 10,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2010, 8:04 am by Martinson & Beason
Martinson ***Editor's Note - This is an article written by M&B attorney Doug Martinson, Sr., in 1982 following the 1982 Alabama v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:39 am by Christine Sellers
The Articles provided for the annual appointment of delegates to the Congress, for the recall of delegates, and for the minimum and maximum number of delegates that would make up each state's delegation. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm by MOTP
It did so based on mistaken facts and extemporized legal grounds that do not hold up upon closer scrutiny.Here is what's wrong with the memorandum opinion by Richard Hightower, handed down in Sheila Kirk v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:07 am
First, Republican member Brian Hayes showed up for yesterday's election rules vote. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 6:02 am
Stanford student Anthony Dick previews today's argument in Horne v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 12:00 pm
While Staples's barren disclosures did not reveal the correct grant dates, the complaint alleges that the company backdated these options by ten days. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 8:02 am
 So let's hear all of our DeSantis judges make a speech today against Gideon v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:06 pm
Now, let's consider a few things, as follows:Judge Lackey and other Lafayette County judges recused themselves from the Jones v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:53 pm
It did however, issue an administrative compliance order stating that the Sackett's failure to cease and desist doing anything on their land would result in penalties of up to $75,000 per day for violations of the Clean Water Act plus possible criminal prosecution. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 5:31 am by Etta Lanum
On New Year’s Day 2017, another ISIS-trained gunman fired into a crowd at the Reina nightclub in Istanbul. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:59 am
(Here's proof, since the Washington Supreme Court videotapes these arguments and puts 'em up on the web. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 6:29 pm
The issues in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:06 am by jpfaff
Earlier in his dissent he cites a passage from Tumey v Ohio, in which the Court states: All questions of judicial qualifications may not involve constitutional validity. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:56 am
There is considerable force in Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent, which points out that “[w]ords no longer have meaning if an Exchange that is not established by a State is ‘established by the State.'” Today may not be a good day for the Court’s statutory interpretation jurisprudence. [read post]