Search for: "Ward v. Ward"
Results 621 - 640
of 2,527
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2015, 3:24 pm
Marty v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:48 pm
" Gubernat v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 11:30 pm
Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:43 pm
And his studies can have real-world impact: In its landmark 2006 ruling in eBay v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 3:52 am
In Pennsylvania last year, the US 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Renchenski v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:54 pm
Microlinc, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:57 pm
The ongoing litigation is Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 3:00 pm
Medtronic Vascular, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176 and other decisions.Quoting from Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, the Appellate Division explained that in the event there is conflicting evidence or different inferences may be drawn from the evidence, "the duty of weighing the evidence and making the choice rests solely upon the [administrative agency]. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
" Citing Matter of Freeman v Ward , 162 AD2d 127, leave to appeal denied 76 NY2d 706, the court explained that the Hearing Officer was free to credit the witnesses' testimony corroborating the child's statements, since weighing the evidence and choosing between conflicting accounts was solely within the province of the administrative agency. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
" Citing Matter of Freeman v Ward , 162 AD2d 127, leave to appeal denied 76 NY2d 706, the court explained that the Hearing Officer was free to credit the witnesses' testimony corroborating the child's statements, since weighing the evidence and choosing between conflicting accounts was solely within the province of the administrative agency. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:39 am
Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927) and Ward v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:15 am
Trial attorneys should consult with appellate counsel to avoid making mistakes or missing important arguments.Following Ward v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:34 pm
Ward v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:48 am
MHL Tek, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 8:48 am
Juniper Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:05 am
Next Tuesday’s argument in Lockhart v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:21 pm
Nance v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 11:48 am
(These cases, including Ramirez v. [read post]