Search for: "Williams v. U. S" Results 621 - 640 of 750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
's interpretation was “not contrary to any express Congressional intent. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Panopticon Blog has an article on Saini J’s latest ruling on claims arising out of external cyber-attacks in Graeme Smith & others v TalkTalk Telecom Group [2022] EWHC 1311 (QB). [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
"Continuous" has been defined as "[u]ninterrupted; unbroken, not intermittent or occasional; so persistently repeated at short intervals as to constitute virtually an unbroken series. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 8:30 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Para ello, es imprescindible que la parte demandante establezca mediante prueba los siguientes requisitos: 1) la existencia de una acción u omisión culposa o negligente; 2) la antijuricidad de la misma; 3) la producción de un daño; y 4) la relación causal entre la acción u omisión y el daño(14). [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 4:19 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Pappas v B & G Holding Co. (2024 NY Slip Op 51218(U) [Sup Ct, Bronx County Sept. 6, 2024]), was reminiscent of the Worbes case I blogged about and then substituted in as counsel helping to bring the case to a successful conclusion – but with the parties’ roles reversed. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Dingemans J gave judgment in Lokhova v Tymula ([2016] EWHC 225 (QB))(heard 26 and 27 January 2016). [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Lasker,“Defending Daubert: It’s Time to Amend Federal Rule of Evidence 702,” 57 William & Mary L. [read post]