Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2014, 5:11 am
United States, 393 F.3d 1277 (Fed. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
The current economic situation in the United States is recognized on all sides to be grim, and not getting better any time soon. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm
§ 2401(a) of the United States Code generally requires that the complaint to commence such an action must be “filed within six-years after the right of action accrues. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:39 pm
In its brief in opposition, the DOJ also wrote, “To be sure, the United States disagrees with the court of appeals’ decision. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:33 pm
United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
Be that as it may, here's Tim's take on what Arnold J's decision has achieved, how they go about dealing with the same phenomenon in the United States -- and where we might go from here:Richemont v BskyB and others: a national solution to a global problem? [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 11:37 am
The budget of the United States shall be deemed unbalanced whenever the total amount of the public debt of the United States at the close of any fiscal year is greater than the total amount of such debt at the close of the preceding fiscal year.Section 2. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 9:59 am
” United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:46 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States recently stayed injunctions against implementing the rule. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
” Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
” Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:15 am
The case, Ruan v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Bruen is quite simply a national nightmare.In United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 1:57 pm
United States, 326 U.S. 279 (1945), the Supreme Court stated that the presence of a single non-exempt purpose, if substantial in nature, will destroy the exemption, regardless of the number or importance of truly exempt purposes. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am
States can’t protect children by overly burdening adult speech, which is what a categorical ban does. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 7:26 am
The email stated the union’s belief that the college had improperly transferred bargaining unit work to employees in those positions. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 3:34 pm
United States, 561 U.S. 358, 370, 383 (2010) (crediting that “the facts of the case were ‘neither heinous nor sensational’” and there was “[n]o evidence of the smoking-gun” of his guilt); United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Petition for certiorari Amicus brief of America’s Health Insurance Plans Amicus brief of Landmark Legal Foundation Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Amicus brief of Family Research Council Harvey v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:03 pm
. . . .V. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
United States, 15-5756, is a spin-off of last Term’s Johnson v. [read post]
