Search for: "Office of Hearing and Appeals" Results 6401 - 6420 of 23,875
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2009, 3:12 pm
Specifically, the Court of Appeals held that the Supreme Court did not err in denying a probable cause motion without a hearing, because it found that that the defendant's motion papers did not sufficiently challenge the People's papers alleging probable cause to arrest. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:15 am by Steve Statsinger
On appeal, the circuit concluded that it was error for the district court to deny the 2255 without a hearing, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the ineffectiveness claim, along with anything else the district court intended to include in the COA, which did not specify any particular issue or issues. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:40 pm by David Ingram
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit in December, the quotation made its way to the offices of the Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 11:19 am by Karsner & Meehan, P.C.
Our office can aggressively pursue all of the damages available from any responsible parties. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 11:19 am by Karsner & Meehan, P.C.
Our office can aggressively pursue all of the damages available from any responsible parties. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:33 am
At the suppression hearing, the parties stipulated that had the police simply unplugged [Thomas’] computer while it was at his office, it would have prevented anyone from deleting evidence on it remotely. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Jill Browning The Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, affirmed the Patent Office's decision that the applicant's claims directed to a method of hedging risk in the field of commodities trading did not meet the patent eligibility standard of  35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
By Jill Browning The Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, affirmed the Patent Office's decision that the applicant's claims directed to a method of hedging risk in the field of commodities trading did not meet the patent eligibility standard of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 12:03 pm by Shawn R. Dominy
The appeal, however, was heard by a city police hearing officer rather than a judge. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:36 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
THE MOST SERIOUS PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED BY TAXPAYERS The Right to Quality Service TAXPAYER SERVICE: Taxpayer Service Has Reached Unacceptably Low Levels and Is Getting Worse, Creating Compliance Barriers and Significant Inconvenience for Millions of Taxpayers TAXPAYER SERVICE: Due to the Delayed Completion of the Service Priorities Initiative, the IRS Currently Lacks a Clear Rationale for Taxpayer Service Budgetary Allocation Decisions IRS LOCAL PRESENCE: The Lack of a Cross-Functional Geographic… [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:45 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The districtcourt held a hearing on these pending motions onFebruary 25, 2014, and expressed concern that the State’ssecond request for an injunction could prevent MPHJfrom sending legitimate assertions regarding patentinfringement to Vermont businesses.As to jurisdiction, the CAFC noted:The parties dispute our jurisdiction over this appeal.The State asserts that we have none and asks that wedismiss the appeal. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 9:21 am by Karen Gullo
At the March 26 hearing, prosecutors said their expert witness’s analysis of the telnet image shows there was connectivity to the router. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:28 am by Tammy Binford
In the May article, Frazier predicted that the Supreme Court ultimately will hear same-sex marriage cases. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 10:23 am
Nevada Appeal 10/26/07 State appeal officer upholds Potts' firing. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:46 pm by Mike Scarcella
Taranto left after a couple of years to join the DOJ’s Solicitor General’s Office. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 2:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Cocaine Possession Lawyer said that, on appeal, defendant urges that the Officer's surveillance of the rest room constituted a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment not justified by exigent circumstances and without benefit of a warrant. [read post]