Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 6421 - 6440 of 13,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2023, 10:57 am by HRWatchdog
Departure from Federal Procedure The United States Supreme Court ruled on June 23 in Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:16 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
In a 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed this issue in Rescuecom Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:04 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
In a 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed this issue in Rescuecom Corp. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
., Inc., 2017 NY Slip Op 02421, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIn this appeal the issue concerned the court's granting of a permanent stay of arbitration of a grievance alleged to have violated a term or condition of the controlling collective bargaining agreement pursuant to CPLR Article 75. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 4:26 am by Jon Gelman
Today's post was shared by Steven Greenhouse and comes from www.reuters.com (Reuters) - The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordered Wal-Mart Stores Inc to pay $188 million to employees who had sued the retailer for failing to compensate them for rest breaks and all hours worked.Wal-Mart said on Tuesday that it might appeal the decision, which upheld lower court rulings, to the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm by NARF
(Joinder; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 2:56 pm
Myriad Genetics, Inc., decided on June 13, 2013, the United States Supreme Court held that isolated natural genes (DNA) are not patentable. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
Compaq Computer the Federal Circuit affirmed in part the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruling that Compaq Computer Corp., Seagate Technology, LLC., and Seagate Technology, Inc. did not misappropriate 11 of 15 alleged trade secrets from Convolve, Inc. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 11:04 am
Oddly enough, the opinion fails to point out that there is no private right of action under Section 558 since Caliber Bodyworks, Inc. v. [read post]