Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 6441 - 6460 of 13,103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2014, 9:57 pm
Effective immediately upon the entry of this Consent Order, uPI will not import into the United States, sell for importation into the United States, or sell or offer for sale in the United States after importation, or knowingly aid, abet, encourage, participate in, or induce importation into the United States, the sale for importation into the United States, or the sale, offer for sale, or use in the… [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which Justice Antonin Scalia issued a statement regarding the denial. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 10:28 am by David Markus
But the notion that “lawful” sentences cannot be challenged on a § 2255 petition is not supported by United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:54 pm by Kirk Jenkins
In 2008 – two years after the Supreme Court’s judgment became final – the FTC filed an amicus brief in an unrelated case before the United States Supreme Court saying that it had never intended to specifically authorize the use of those terms. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-29, a case seeking to clarify several standards regarding insider trading. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Ocasio v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am by Schachtman
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:38 am by Morin Jacob
Superior Court (Johnson) considered the interplay between the United States Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am by Maureen Johnston
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 6:40 am by Joy Waltemath
And while the union responded that the NLRA forbids it — the NLRB will not process a representation petition seeking a “members only” bargaining unit, and a union has no recourse if the employer refuses to bargain — that was of no concern to the state high court. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:51 pm by Florian Mueller
The Supreme Court of the United States is concerned with proper interpretation of what Congress decides, and not with making policy judgments for Congress.I'm not going to discuss the frequently-cited SAS Institute v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Menominee Indian Tribe Cert Petition Question presented: Whether the D.C. [read post]