Search for: "State v. Mai"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 133,205
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
” The FAST Act defined a “Fast Food Restaurant” as a restaurant that (i) provides food or beverages, (ii) for immediate consumption on or off the restaurant’s premises; (iii) to customers who order and pay for items prior to eating; (iv) with items sold or prepared in advance, including items that may be prepared in bulk and kept hot, or items that can be prepared or heated quickly; and (v) with limited or no table service. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
In Katz v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:44 am
.'” “Law Firm Hack Affects Victims of an Earlier Breach Again” — “Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe on July 20 reported the data breach to several state regulators, including the attorneys general of Maine and California, as well as a HIPAA breach to the U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
For example, BPJ v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:36 am
In 1971, the court ruled in Griggs v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:13 am
This case shows how it all works.The case is Hunter v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s May 2023 decision in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
As one commenter stated: “In the hours and days following a cybersecurity breach, companies must quickly and efficiently contain, minimize, and remedy any damage or loss resultin [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 4:34 pm
The stated goals of Prop. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:41 pm
The appeals court cited Roman v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Tribal rights, water rights, states’ rights and the Colorado River: What’s at stake in the SCOTUS case, Arizona v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:25 pm
If, as the Court held in Hawaii v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:13 pm
And Napear v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:31 am
” Companies may state, without being misleading, that they intend to “oppose” the allegations. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 10:51 am
” Claimant’s Burden of Proof and Requirements to Establish a Prima Facie Case Under the Pannu factors, to qualify as a joint inventor, “an alleged joint inventor must prove by clear and convincing evidence” that an alleged joint inventor (i) “contributed in some significant manner to the conception of the invention[,]” (ii) “made a contribution to the claimed invention that is not insignificant in quality, when that contribution is measured against the… [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:50 am
This is particularly interesting because these Regulations have not been updated since Brexit, which means they still refer, for instance, to “the law of the other member State”. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Stegall (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 4:05 am
In Kumar v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
Waradzin v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:53 am
In Sun Pharma v. [read post]
