Search for: "Beare v. State" Results 6461 - 6480 of 15,039
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2011, 3:39 am by Vivian Persand
§ 628.46, which stated: Insurance claims shall bear interest at the rate of twelve percent per year if not paid within thirty days after the insurer is furnished written notice of the fact and amount of the covered loss. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 8:43 am by Eugene Volokh
The Illinlois Supreme Court had already held that the Second Amendment protects a right to carry guns in most public places, and in today's People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 10:38 am by Chuck Ramsay
Defendant shall receive access to the source code from CMI pursuant to the instructions and parameters set forth in State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:14 am by GuestPost
(For an interesting case on this issue, see the famous US Sixth Court of Appeals decision in Mozert v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 5:55 am by Patricia Salkin
The court of common pleas reversed, finding the PRO’s 40-foot limitation on building frontage was “incapable of rational application and bears no rational basis to the stated purpose of the PRO. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:13 am
Cuomo: A New York attorney challenged a state law prohibiting the possession of a so-called chuka stick, a weapon used in martial arts, claiming the ruling violated his Second Amendment right to bear arms. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
  Later, after plaintiff’s device had failed and another device had to be implanted, the defendant allegedly “recalled a component of the [device] bearing the same catalogue number as the one that had been implanted in” plaintiff. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
I think you know but in case you don't: #notajudge7) Justice Alito and RomeShortly after reversing 50 years of precedent and returning the issue of abortion to the states in an opinion utterly devoid of empathy for women and families whose lives will be ruined by states forcing them to bear children against their will, Alito traveled to Rome to give a speech sponsored and paid for by, wait for it, the Notre Dame Law School's Religious Liberty Initiative. [read post]