Search for: "Individual Does 1-10" Results 6461 - 6480 of 14,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2011, 2:56 pm by James Hamilton
While the outcomes of these votes are not binding on the company, noted the SEC Chair, the advisory vote does let boards know what shareholders think of compensation arrangements. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:54 am by Neumann Law Group
Michigan Appeals Court Upholds Ruling for Defendant Market Following Slip and Fall, Neumann Law Group, March 1, 2017. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:00 pm by Beyond Intractability
(San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994), 8. 4 Ibid. 5 Ibid. 6 Ibid, 10. 7 Burgess, Heidi and Guy M. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:00 am by Beck, et al.
Individuals and pharmacies that paid for Duract received refunds. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 7:37 pm by Bill Marler
 Such immunity does not last long, though. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:07 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The bill proposes four tax rates (not three, as had been anticipated): 12%, 25%, 35%, and 39.6%, which will be indexed for inflation: 12%: $0 – $45,000 for individuals ($90,000 for married taxpayers) 25%: $45,001 – $200,000 for individuals ($260,000 for married taxpayers) 35%: $200,001 – $500,000 for individuals ($1 million for married taxpayers) 39.6%: $500,001+ for individuals ($1,000,001+ for married taxpayers) We currently have… [read post]
20 May 2016, 12:58 pm by Joshua A. Stein
  The penalties would be triggered if:  (i) the animal is not a service animal with regard to the person in question; and/or (ii) the person does not have a disability. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 7:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Feb. 10, 2015) Fair use should be nonpartisan; copyright restrictionists are generally liberal, but Fox deserves fair use too, even if it does dumb stuff. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:48 am
The net result of the EBA finding the request inadmissible, Mr Battistelli says, is that it reveals a “dilemma between Article 23(1) EPC, Article 11(3 and 4) EPC as well as Article 10 EPC”. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 10:31 am by Rick Pildes
”].[1] The same would be true here: Because the legislation does not add to the substantive powers Mueller already has under the existing DOJ regulations (which is even more obvious under my proposal), the legislation would not be ripe for review unt [read post]