Search for: "S. W., an individual"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 11,737
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2014, 12:33 pm
By William W. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Colt’s-foot (Tussilago farfara L.) 2. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 10:38 am
For over one hundred years, technological change has motivated the legal protection of the individual’s right to privacy. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:27 pm
See, e.g., Georgia § 40-8-26; W. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
While the focus of this short (44 page) report is not on the intellectual property aspects of the subject, it nonetheless remains a relevant issue as the need to provide a neutral forum for the administration of justice must be balanced with the individual litigant's right to privacy or, at his option, publicity and the public's interest in being kept informed on matters of public interest. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 4:53 pm
With Texas now hosting many of the world’s largest corporations,* our public policy has shifted from a patriarchal one in which we valued uniform treatment of Texas employees from one employer to the next above all else, to one in which we also value the ability of a company to maintain uniformity in its employment contracts across all employees, whether the individual employees reside in Texas or New York. ___________________ * Fifty-two of the 2014 Fortune 500… [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
This is unconstitutional, given modern First Amendment precedents and our nation’s and Minnesota’s commitment to the freedom of speech. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(r) Money, not to exceed $500,000 in present value, held in: (1) An individual retirement arrangement which conforms with the applicable limitations and requirements of section 408 or 408A of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(r) Money, not to exceed $500,000 in present value, held in: (1) An individual retirement arrangement which conforms with the applicable limitations and requirements of section 408 or 408A of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:13 pm
Thus, the court phrased the issue as follows: "[W]hether it was proper for [the Service] to rely on nonbinding and unenforceable representations [in the Addendum] when it concluded that the state's plan was adequate to ensure that the state will in fact maintain the necessary number of breeding pairs and individual wolves. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:08 pm
As a result, the OIG writes, “[w]hile copayment coupons provide an immediate financial benefit to beneficiaries, they ultimately can harm both Federal health care programs and their beneficiaries. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 11:27 am
By William W. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:18 am
Specifically, witnesses testified that the conspirators obtained the identity information of a least four individuals, without those individuals’ knowledge or permission. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 3:30 am
Jumping off from his work on social equality and antidiscrimination protections, Bagenstos notes the difference: “[w]here employment discrimination law targets the threats to social equality caused by occupational segregation and group-based subordination, individual employment law should be understood as targeting the threat to social equality posed by a boss’s ability to leverage her economic power over workers into a more general social hierarchy in and out… [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 2:55 pm
Key points include: “[W]hether a claimed cost comes within the general cost statute, and is recoverable at all…. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm
In Petrella, the Supreme Court limited its particularly holding to copyright law and noted that “[w]e have not had occasion to review the Federal Circuit’s position” on laches in patent cases. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 6:26 pm
Today's post was shared by Take Justice Back and comes from www.tennessean.com The U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
Administrative regulations are a form of instrumental law-making delegated from legitimately elected representatives of popular power to appointed officials within increasingly complex administrative and managerial bureaucracies that simultaneously make, enforce and determine individual violations of its own rules. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
The Borman decision raised a difficult problem, which the panel of Judges Sloviter, Scirica, and Alito, never addressed: why had the defense not carried its burden of showing a basis for apportionment when: (1) all expert witnesses agreed that tobacco was a cause of the plaintiff’s cancer; (2) jury heard the quantified risks of tobacco and asbestos, which showed that tobacco had been a larger risk in the plaintiff’s case; and (3) the plaintiff’s expert… [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:13 pm
W. [read post]
