Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 15,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2016, 7:22 am
Lees v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
Also, consider Brownmark v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
The brief was filed in support of upholding the DOL’s original ruling in Palmer v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm
Boundary crossing: sharing research w/community at large v. within the pharma co. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
David Hyman & David Franklyn A couple of small empirical studies and armchair empiricism; lots of regulatory interest. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
. - In the matter of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
. - In the matter of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am
Predictable v. unpredictable. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:02 am
Lucia Cos. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
The case exemplifying this is United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 1:34 pm
However, as demonstrated in the Court of Appeal’s decision in Fernandes v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:23 am
Minimal impact In Locke, Chief Justice Rehnquist distinguished the state’s exclusion of ministerial studies from the scholarship program from a state measure intended to suppress religion — such as the municipal ordinance found unconstitutional in Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:17 am
In Whitaker v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
First, the denial of funds in Locke was not based on anyone’s religious status; it was based on the state’s decision not to fund a particular program of study. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 4:55 pm
In the last post, we discussed the facts of the court case Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:44 am
The Supreme Court has recently granted him permission to appeal the Court of Appeal’s decision in the related case of R (Bancoult (No 3)) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] EWCA Civ 708. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 8:42 am
Additional Resources: Surgery improves OS in malignant pleural mesothelioma, July 20, 2016, Helio, By Yang CFJ More Blog Entries: Rondon v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
Law creates idea that the market is separate from the state. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
