Search for: "Berger v. Berger" Results 641 - 660 of 800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am by Josh Blackman
I count at least five cases from before the presidential election, which challenged COVID-related voting procedures: Berger v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am by John Elwood
and relisted it for the third time, while Berger v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:12 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Tags: Executive Compensation, Long-Term value, Repurchases, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder value, Taxation Marking to Market Versus Taking to Market Posted by Guillaume Plantin (Sciences Po) and Jean Tirole (University of Toulouse & IAST) , on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Tags: Accounting, Agency costs, Contracts, Fair values, Information… [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:29 am by Michael Feit
BGE 126 III 249 E. 3c; ferner: BGE 132 V 93 E. 7.1 S. 109 f.; 127 I 73 E. 3f/bb S. 81; 125 II 541 E. 4a S. 544 f.; 120 V 357 E. 3a S. 365). [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 8:50 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Maybe it's just that with so much more than money at stake, and so little billing by the hour on either side, we're often more accommodating about the truly trivial.Or maybe we just deceive ourselves.In Berger v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:22 pm by Gene Quinn
During a comparable span (1981-1986) drawn from the Berger Court years, the Chamber’s win ratio was just 43%. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 6:39 am by Russell Knight
“[C]ourts will presume a spouse who placed non-marital property in joint tenancy with the other spouse intended to make a gift to the marital estate” Berger v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Berger, Kahn, Shafton, Moss, Figler, Simon & Gladstone, 131 Cal. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
In his seminal work calling executive privilege a “constitutional myth,” Raoul Berger wrote that when “seeking to ascertain the boundaries between the conflicting claims of Congress and the President, questions of practical convenience need to be separated from the issue of constitutional power. [read post]