Search for: "Blakely v. State"
Results 641 - 660
of 994
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2010, 3:43 am
I think the bigger problem is that the database approach views cases quantitatively, rather than qualitatively: Blakely and Crawford are no more significant than Arizona v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Blake, [2000] UKHL 45, [2001] 1 A.C. 268 (H.L.) [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
Blake, 29 S.W.3d 26 (Tenn. 2000). [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Mr Justice Blake roundly rejected B’s argument. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:12 am
Rich Blake reports for ABC News that gun sales in the Chicago area are likely to increase dramatically following the elimination of local- and state-level handgun bans, while Courthouse News Service reports on a Nevada suit – challenging that state’s ban on handguns in state parks – filed in the wake of McDonald. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:51 am
As the Supreme Court stated in footnote 35 of Stone v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:42 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:14 pm
V. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:29 pm
In Ontario (Public Safety and Security) v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:38 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
Whether this is practically possible, in light of the state’s e [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm
As Judge Campbell noted in Blake v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Further, contrary to the petitioners' contention, the law does not limit the application of a lack of marketability discount to the goodwill of a corporation in all instances (see Matter of Brooklyn Home Dialysis Training Ctr., 293 AD2d 747; Hall v King, 265 AD2d 244, 245; Lehman v Piontkowski, 203 AD2d 257, 259; Matter of Raskin v Walter Karl, Inc., 129 AD2d 642, 644; Matter of Joy Wholesale Sundries, 125 AD2d 310; Matter of Fleischer, 107 AD2d 97; Matter of… [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:25 am
On the other hand, I’ve seen other appellate opinions do the same thing (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:27 pm
" The Second District stated that the "circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law by failing to apply the principle espoused in Blake v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 4:23 am
Blakely needs to do her homework. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:02 pm
. ''Casey'' Ebsary has just obtained an Internal Policy Memorandum on Charging and Sentencing that was just circulated to Assistant United States Attorneys. [read post]